Some of us are doomed to use a combination of Revit / Civil3d (other DWG software) together for years to come. Keeping old drafting software and techniques around because you don't want to fix what isn't broke is understandable, but when you're expending resources on new software, new efforts, etc, I would then begin to consider my full options. I still use AutoCAD daily, but diving into a platform and spending a lot of time and resources to learn something like ACA when you could be putting those eggs in a more productive basket is all I'm trying to convey to you. I understand people are comfortable with AutoCAD but realistically people who use CAD software for production should consider the trade offs as a whole. I tell you these things as a last reminder to consider your avenue. ![]() I use Revit for construction every single day. I'm an old ACA user and it does not compare in any way shape or form to Revit's section/elevation capabilities.Ĥ. You mentioned elevations in your first post: this is Revit's specialty. AutoCAD architecture was Autodesk's attempt to mimic Revit in an AutoCAD platform when Autodesk bought Revit.ģ. Revit has a ton of resources, and is not a dying platform so it will continue to grow.Ģ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |